#ai-adoption

#ai-adoption

As the senior functional lead, the post-holder will drive and evolve common technology architecture and standards to support the realization of [the MoD's] strategic intent. They will oversee strategy, transformation, design, and implementation, ensuring supporting architecture, standards, and compliance processes are maintained.

Either way, I think the AI boom is alive and well, but with much of the short-term hype fading away, the big question is whether the long-term trajectory is still there and whether it makes sense for investors to hit the buy button now that the near-term is somewhat less hyped while the long-term is as exciting as ever.

Gartner says that its July 2025 survey of nearly 3,000 employees showed that 46 percent of managers are experimenting with AI to improve their work, compared to just 26 percent of employees. A separate survey conducted at the same time found that just 14 percent of managers said that they didn't face any challenges encouraging their teams to use AI.

Apple had already announced in January that Google's Gemini AI models would help power the upgraded version of Siri it delayed last year, but The Information's report indicates Apple might lean even more on Google so it can catch up in AI.

A 2025 LinkedIn study found that 80% of C-suite executives believe AI adoption is important and will foster a more innovative workplace culture. Gartner reported in December 2025 that 65% of employees said they are excited to use AI at work. The trend suggests a convergence of three priorities: Management fears their companies will fall behind if they don't adopt AI and automation; Employees use AI because it makes their jobs easier, and the knowledge gained is an important career skill; The cost of off-the-shelf software and development makes AI an attractive alternative.

The strongest candidates are "able to think outside the box," Ahmad, director of Google Cloud's data cloud, said. "They're able to think outside the frame of how we would have normally described a problem." The executive added that candidates who take a traditional approach to engineering aren't performing as well in her team's interviews.

We are raising fiscal year 2026 revenue guidance to $41.45 billion to $41.55 billion, and Q3 cRPO was exceptional, up 11% year-over-year at $29.4 billion, signaling a powerful pipeline of future revenue.

A major problem for software companies is that their opponent is largely hypothetical. Even if both companies report blockbuster earnings, there's still the counterargument that AI will eventually eat their lunch.

AI is transforming how teams work. But it's not just the tools that matter. It's what happens to thinking when those tools do the heavy lifting, and whether managers notice before the gap widens. Across industries, there's a common pattern. AI-supported work looks polished. The reports are clean. The analyses are structured. But when someone asks the team to defend a decision, not summarize one, the room goes quiet. The output is there, but the reasoning isn't owned.

Accenture staff must demonstrate they have fully bought into the consultancy's AI vision if they want to get on. A memo sent to senior staff this week, and reported in the FT, informed them that promotions to top roles at the corporation would necessitate "regular adoption" of AI tooling, and it is tracking uage. In a statement to The Register, Accenture said:

The UK is entering a pivotal phase in the evolution of its digital economy as artificial intelligence (AI) shifts from experimental innovation to mainstream dependency. Platforms such as ChatGPT now attract hundreds of millions of weekly active users worldwide, while Microsoft 365 Copilot has been rapidly adopted across the enterprise landscape, with nearly 70% of Fortune 500 companies integrating it into daily workflows.

Focus the conversation on tasks, not titles-what parts of the job may become easier and what parts will require more human judgment, context, and problem-solving. Be explicit about where AI fits and where it doesn't. Often, the aim of introducing AI is to strip out busywork so people can spend more time on problem-solving and generating ideas that move the work forward.

Artificial intelligence may dominate the conversation in boardrooms and break rooms alike-but a new Google report suggests most workers still haven't adopted the technology en masse. In a study conducted with Ipsos and shared exclusively with Fortune, Google found that just two in five U.S. workers (40%) are even casually using AI on the job. Only 5% are considered "AI fluent," meaning they've redesigned or reorganized significant portions of their work with the technology.

A common perception is that AI adoption requires specialized data scientists or massive upfront infrastructure investments. In reality, the true value of modern AI lies in its ability to solve common, costly operational challenges that affect nearly every organization. AI can analyze vast amounts of data far faster than human teams, delivering predictive insights that optimize supply chains, streamline administrative work and improve decision-making across departments.

A musician may begin learning a new piece and find themselves lost in the weeds, fumbling while thinking about fingering options, phrasing decisions, and micro-adjustments to dynamics. A golfer may end up actually lost in the weeds after needlessly obsessing over specialized techniques, swing plane, and ball flights. And the manager rolling out a new AI workflow? Their simple automation idea can devolve into scattershot attempts at broad goals, governance concerns, and vague existential questions about productivity.

Indeed survey data paints a stark picture of uneven AI engagement across advanced economies. The chart below shows a clear frontrunner: Ireland stands out, with roughly seven in ten workers using AI at least monthly for work, followed by Australia, Germany, and North America. At the other end sits Japan, where fewer than one in five workers report professional AI use - less than half the level seen in the US or UK.

Companies in most industries are investing heavily in artificial intelligence: 88% of companies reporting regular AI use. Yet many leaders report familiar frustrations. AI adoption stalls. Performance gains plateau. Employees experiment with new tools but don't integrate them deeply into how work actually gets done, leaving executives increasingly concerned about ROI. Erin Eatough is a co-founder and chief science officer at Fractional Insights and professor of organizational psychology at Michigan State University.

Trust has fast become one of the central questions in every serious conversation about AI. Not capabilities. Not efficiency. Trust. If customers don't trust how companies deploy AI, they'll walk away. If employees don't trust it, they'll disengage. If enterprises don't trust their AI providers, they won't adopt. A recent global KPMG study found that while two-thirds of people now use AI regularly, fewer than half say they're willing to trust it.

PRAGUE-(BUSINESS WIRE)- monday.com, the AI work platform that turns strategy into execution at scale, today announced key expansions to its partner program at its sixth annual Partner Summit. The updates are designed to unlock the AI opportunity across the partner ecosystem and enable joint customers to achieve unprecedented efficiency, impact, and growth. The multi-day event brings together over 500 professionals from over 40 countries to drive scalable growth across the monday.com ecosystem and build momentum through 2026.

I'm a director on the global strategy team at Freshworks, where I drive high-priority strategic initiatives that shape the company's growth, investment decisions, and execution, including on AI adoption. Previously, I spent nearly a decade at PwC advising Fortune 500 companies across healthcare, financial services, and technology on growth strategy and digital transformation. As part of my role, I led the upskilling of over 50,000 employees on automation tools.

Advancements in AI technology make our personal and work lives easier and more efficient. Or so they say. From search engines to customer service chatbots to athletic facilities, AI platforms are being introduced at a rapid pace. However, does AI make everything better or more efficient within your company? It depends on who you ask. As a competitive adult tennis player, I enjoy following professional tennis, especially the top men and women players.

Mark Cuban expects legions of workers will be needed to implement AI at companies, creating a huge opportunity for tech-savvy young people. The tech billionaire and former "Shark Tank" investor made the prediction during an August interview with TBPN, a tech talk show and podcast. AI guru Rohan Paul shared a clip of Cuban's comments over the weekend, which was widely reposted; Cuban himself shared three responses from other AI gurus on his X feed.

A year or so ago, most legal departments were still testing. AI pilots. Workflow trials. Small process experiments. Everyone was learning cautiously. The stakes were relatively low, and the work was labeled "innovation," which made imperfection forgivable. Then something shifted. Those same pilots became part of day-to-day delivery, and the business started relying on them. Sometimes intentionally, because early results looked good.

On a personal basis, that means people using AI services want to be able to veto big decisions such as making payments, accessing or using contact details, changing account details, placing orders, or even just seeking clarity during a decision-making process. Extend this way of thinking to the working environment and the resistance is likely to be equally strong in professional settings.

We're under immense pressure to adopt AI. We're buying tools, licensing copilots and training teams on prompt engineering. But in our rush to modernize, we are often taking our existing, convoluted, approval-heavy, siloed workflows - think of them as our corporate cow paths - and simply adding AI to them. The result is bad processes happening quickly. If you apply AI to a workflow riddled with friction, you get chaos faster than efficiency.