PolarQuant is doing most of the compression, but the second step cleans up the rough spots. Google proposes smoothing that out with a technique called Quantized Johnson-Lindenstrauss (QJL).
By neoclouds, I'm referring to GPU-centric, purpose-built cloud services that focus primarily on AI training and inference rather than on the sprawling catalog of general-purpose services that hyperscalers offer. In many cases, these platforms deliver better price-performance for AI workloads because they're engineered for specific goals: keeping expensive accelerators highly utilized, minimizing platform overhead, and providing a clean path from model development to deployment.
What happens under the hood? How is the search engine able to take that simple query, look for images in the billions, trillions of images that are available online? How is it able to find this one or similar photos from all that? Usually, there is an embedding model that is doing this work behind the hood.
A major difference between LLMs and LTMs is the type of data they're able to synthesize and use. LLMs use unstructured data-think text, social media posts, emails, etc. LTMs, on the other hand, can extract information or insights from structured data, which could be contained in tables, for instance. Since many enterprises rely on structured data, often contained in spreadsheets, to run their operations, LTMs could have an immediate use case for many organizations.
OpenAI's GPT-5.2 Pro does better at solving sophisticated math problems than older versions of the company's top large language model, according to a new study by Epoch AI, a non-profit research institute.
The new capabilities center on two integrated components: the Dynamo Planner Profiler and the SLO-based Dynamo Planner. These tools work together to solve the "rate matching" challenge in disaggregated serving. The teams use this term when they split inference workloads. They separate prefill operations, which process the input context, from decode operations that generate output tokens. These tasks run on different GPU pools. Without the right tools, teams spend a lot of time determining the optimal GPU allocation for these phases.