Productivity
fromTNW | Artificial-Intelligence
2 days agoWhy probability, not averages, is reshaping AI decision-making
ChanceOmeters measure uncertainty directly, improving decision-making by providing odds rather than relying solely on averages.
We're investing a lot in AI - we're doing a lot, but we're stopping at individual productivity. We're not taking the next step. You can't just screw AI on everything - it only makes you faster. It means you need to think about, 'how are our teams collaborating? How are people collaborating?' You probably need to change the way you work.
Weather impacts sales. Every retailer knows it. But for most, the likelihood that it might rain, snow, or sleet on the third of March somewhere in the Midwest is rarely used. Vendors such as Weather Trends have offered accurate, long-range forecasts for more than 20 years. But the opportunity is not predicting the weather; it's knowing what to do with the data. AI might change that.
Imagine you're selecting an influencer to work with on your new campaign. You've narrowed it down to two, both in the right area, both creating the right sort of content. One has 24.6 million subscribers, the other 1.4 million. Which do you choose? Now imagine you could find out the first had 8.7 million unique viewers last month, while the second had 9.9 million. Do you want to change your mind?
A traveler might search for a weekend getaway and still see travel ads weeks later, long after returning home. The data was right. The timing wasn't.AI-driven marketing has the potential to close that gap - but only if it understands context. Personalization built solely on identity or past behavior can reveal who someone is, but not when or why they're ready to act.As AI takes center stage in marketing strategy, context is emerging as the differentiator that turns reactive automation into predictive intelligence.
Every year, poor communication and siloed data bleed companies of productivity and profit. Research shows U.S. businesses lose up to $1.2 trillion annually to ineffective communication, that's about $12,506 per employee per year. This stems from breakdowns that waste an average of 7.47 hours per employee each week on miscommunications. The damage isn't only interpersonal; it's structural. Disconnected and fragmented data systems mean that employees spend around 12 hours per week just searching for information trapped in those silos.
The title "data scientist" is quietly disappearing from job postings, internal org charts, and LinkedIn headlines. In its place, roles like "AI engineer," "applied AI engineer," and "machine learning engineer" are becoming the norm. This Data Scientist vs AI Engineer shift raises an important question for practitioners and leaders alike: what actually changes when a data scientist becomes an AI engineer, and what stays the same? More importantly, what skills matter if you want to make this transition intentionally rather than by accident?